Showing posts with label corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corruption. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Can Filipinos be saved from themselves?

Why we must criticise the poor for voting corrupt candidates into public office.


Image by Bullit Marquez/AP

I know what you’re thinking: who I am to tell poor Filipinos who to vote for? If they want to vote for a corrupt candidate, that is their right. Suffrage is a political right that any voter can exercise according to his or her conscience. Yet nowadays, I argue that many Filipinos just don’t seem to understand and appreciate this right. And it pains me so much that they waste away this opportunity to make true social and economic reform. 

The same corrupt governors, mayors, congressmen and women, and senators get elected every time. Why? From Cotabato, Iriga, Makati, Cavite and all the way up to Ilocos; the same families still rule these places. The Ampatuans, Alfelors, Binays, Revillas, and the Marcoses have dominated the political landscape. The economic conditions on these places have barely improved. Income is still pathetically low; jobs and infrastructure are still lacking. Everyone knows these people are corrupt. So why do they keep electing them back into office?
 
Perhaps the poor are too afraid to speak up? The proliferation of guns and goons has truly kept the masses in silence and fearing for their lives. How did the Ampatuans get that many guns in the first place?
 
Perhaps it is the sense of futility and helplessness? People are too tired to fight and to voice their rights knowing it will only fall on deaf ears. There is a constant perception that anyone who is in politics is guilty of corruption, so why change?
 
Perhaps poor Filipinos are used to living in poverty? Lack of education, coupled with religious superstitions, has moulded a generation of poor Filipinos too lazy to fight and assert for their basic rights.
 
Perhaps Filipinos have not truly seen the need for elections in the first place? Elections are purely cosmetic in Philippine society. I remember voting in Australia for the first time and I was disappointed. There were no people handing out money, no PPCRV, no flying voters, and no free lunch or sandwiches! Remember, we have barely tasted independence from Spain in 1898 when the Americans became our new colonial masters. All this time, Filipinos never saw the importance of the ballot, because we were too busy trying to kick out these colonizers. Generations of Filipinos never actually grew out of colonial infancy. Filipinos were in perpetual ignorance of the benefits of the ballot.
 
On the other hand, people in other countries have fought, suffered and even died for this right. In 1917 America, President Woodrow Wilson encountered a few dozen women suffragists protesting silently outside the gates of the White House with one of the banners reading: “How long must women wait for liberty?” The women were harassed and beaten and were later jailed; one named Alice Paul launched a hunger strike and was sent to the psychiatric ward. The women suffered immensely throughout the incarceration. President Wilson eventually felt the growing pressure from the public and media. He later pardoned all the women and in a few years, through an amendment in the US Constitution, the women were finally able to vote. It was an astonishing achievement.
 
The famous civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. recognized the ballot as a powerful tool to combat blatant racism in 1960s America. Together with then President Lyndon Johnson, the Voting Rights Act was called ‘‘a triumph for freedom as huge as any victory that has ever been won on any battlefield’’. But winning the right to vote is one thing, exercising it is another. Martin Luther King Jr saw that problem when he said, “that the ballot would only be an effective tool for social change if potential voters rid themselves of the fear associated with voting.” Back then, black voters had to contend with the onslaught of harassments and attempts of states and counties, using regulations and tests, to deny them the right to vote.
 
Many developing countries like the Philippines are still constantly battling election violence that deters many people to vote. But election violence can be minimized, and perpetrators of election violence can be put to justice. The Ampatuans were brought to justice. The current Aquino administration lately has been very successful in going after corrupt politicians. We saw the Chief Justice Corona booted out of office. We saw Benhur Luy testified against Napoles and three Senators. We saw former Makati vice Mayor Ernesto Mercado's testimonies against Vice President Jejomar Binay. For the first time in many years, I am confident to say I trust the justice system in the Philippines.
 
For the first time too, I will temporarily stop criticising corrupt politicians. I am going after a new target, the “bobotante” (stupid voters). Because no matter how thoughtful and rational my selection process of candidates is, the bobotante still outnumber conscientious voters. If Noynoy Aquino did not run for President in 2010, we would have Joseph Estrada, a convicted plunderer, back in Malacanang, no thanks to 8 million voters!
 
It took Western civilization over 300 years fighting for the right to vote; obviously the Philippines cannot wait another 300 years for Filipinos to realize the importance of the ballot in nation-building. The change must start now.

Saturday, December 28, 2013

Likeable Senator Santiago’s remarkable example

It is safe to say that Sen. Miriam Santiago’s loyalty is to principles, first of all. Whether she is exposing political incompetence or corruption in Congress, or speaking against Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile on the issue of pork barrel, or defending women’s rights through the Reproductive Health Law; you can count on her to speak about equality, truth, justice and free speech. Agree with her or not, loath her or love her, it is impossible to dismiss her and quite difficult not to be influenced by her views and opinions. It is said that the current Philippine political and social scene is dominated by women. Without doubt, she is on the top of this list.

Santiago, figuratively speaking, has the balls to challenge anyone on jurisprudence. Named a judge of the International Criminal Court, Santiago’s firm grasp of the law makes her a formidable opponent in or out of the Senate. Santiago’s political wrangles with Enrile underscore her resolve to pursue justice and truth, more so because these issues affect everyone.

However, many Filipinos—especially those who are on society’s sidelines and who are abroad, those who are poor and those who are disgusted with wasteful public expenditures and with corruption—like her. On the other hand, those who conflate her confrontational approach with the issues she raises may be missing something valuable: “One of the beginnings of human emancipation is the ability to laugh at authority,”  a point made by another equally passionate fighter for free speech and truth, the prominent journalist Christopher Hitchens.

And questioning authority is what Santiago does. Nobody is exempt from her acrid tongue, not even priests. To her, no one is a sacred cow. Perhaps this is a good thing for democracy in the Philippines.

But what Santiago is actually teaching us is history—our history of fighting corrupt authority. We overthrew Spain’s absolute rule, we fought against the Americans and Japanese for independence; we overthrew the Marcos dictatorship, and now we have a fighting chance against corrupt leaders—again. Apparently many of us are still cowed by power-hungry politicians, those who are supposed to serve us. For example, I was furious when I learned that a local electricity cooperative failed to pay its electric supplier P713 million, thus plunging Iriga and five other Camarines Sur towns into darkness. This is the height of irresponsibility on the part of an authority.

The challenge for all Filipinos is this: If you happen to witness any case of injustice, or corruption or criminality in your town or barangay, just imagine how Santiago would respond to it.


Read more: http://opinion.inquirer.net/68267/likeable-senator-santiagos-remarkable-example#ixzz3ASpHJi5H